Properties of Limits and Calculation Techniques
In the introduction to limits, we saw that
x→alimf(x)=L
means that the values of f(x) approach L as x approaches a.
Now we will develop tools that allow us to calculate limits systematically.
The main ideas in this topic are:
- algebraic properties of limits;
- direct substitution;
- factoring;
- simplifying expressions;
- rationalization;
- one-sided limits;
- identifying indeterminate forms.
1. Sum Property
If the limits
x→alimf(x)=L
and
x→alimg(x)=M,
exist, then
x→alim[f(x)+g(x)]=L+M
Example
Calculate
x→2lim(x2+3x).
We can separate the limit:
x→2limx2+x→2lim3x.
Then,
22+3(2)=4+6.
Therefore,
x→2lim(x2+3x)=10
2. Difference Property
Similarly,
x→alim[f(x)−g(x)]=L−M
Example
x→3lim(x2−2x).
We have
32−2(3)=9−6.
Therefore,
x→3lim(x2−2x)=3
3. Product Property
If
x→alimf(x)=L
and
x→alimg(x)=M,
then
x→alim[f(x)g(x)]=LM
Example
x→2lim(x+1)(x2+3).
We can substitute directly:
(2+1)(22+3).
=3⋅7.
Therefore,
21.
4. Constant Property
If c is a constant, then
x→alimc=c
Furthermore,
x→alim[cf(x)]=cx→alimf(x)
Example
If
x→2limf(x)=5,
then
x→2lim3f(x)=3⋅5=15.
5. Quotient Property
If
x→alimf(x)=L
and
x→alimg(x)=M,
with M=0, then
x→alimg(x)f(x)=ML
Example
Calculate
x→2limx+3x2+1.
Since the denominator does not equal zero at x=2, we can substitute directly:
2+322+1=55.
Therefore,
x→2limx+3x2+1=1
6. Limits of Powers
If
x→alimf(x)=L,
then, for a natural number n,
x→alim[f(x)]n=Ln
Example
x→2lim(x+1)3.
Substituting:
(2+1)3=33.
Therefore,
27.
7. Limits of Roots
When the expression is defined in the domain under consideration, we can use
x→alimnf(x)=nL
Example
x→4limx+5.
Substituting x=4:
4+5=9=3.
Therefore,
x→4limx+5=3
8. Direct Substitution
The properties above allow us to solve many limits simply by substituting x=a.
For example:
x→3limx+1x2+2x−1.
Substituting x=3:
3+132+2(3)−1.
=49+6−1.
=414.
Therefore,
x→3limx+1x2+2x−1=27
Attention
Direct substitution should be the first attempt.
However, it does not always immediately give us the limit.
9. When 00 Appears
Consider:
x→2limx−2x2−4.
Substituting directly:
2−222−4=00.
In this case, we cannot conclude that the limit is zero or that it does not exist.
The expression
00
is an indeterminate form.
We need to transform the expression before calculating the limit.
10. Factoring Technique
In the previous example, we have
x2−4.
Using the difference of squares:
x2−4=(x−2)(x+2).
Thus,
x−2x2−4=x−2(x−2)(x+2).
For x=2:
x−2x2−4=x+2.
Therefore,
x→2limx−2x2−4=x→2lim(x+2).
Now we can substitute:
2+2=4.
Therefore,
x→2limx−2x2−4=4
Important Idea
Even if the original expression is not defined at x=2, the limit may still exist.
What matters is the behavior of the function near 2.
11. Another Factoring Example
Calculate
x→1limx−1x2+x−2.
Substituting directly:
1−11+1−2=00.
We have an indeterminate form.
Factoring the numerator:
x2+x−2=(x−1)(x+2).
Then,
x−1x2+x−2=x+2,x=1.
Therefore,
x→1limx−1x2+x−2=1+2.
Thus,
3.
12. Rationalization Technique
Another very common situation occurs when we have square roots.
Consider:
x→4limx−4x−2.
Direct substitution produces
4−44−2=00.
We again have an indeterminate form.
In this case, we can use the conjugate.
The conjugate of
x−2
is
x+2.
We multiply the numerator and denominator by the conjugate:
x−4x−2⋅x+2x+2.
The numerator becomes a difference of squares:
(x−2)(x+2)=x−4.
Thus,
(x−4)(x+2)(x−4).
For x=4:
x+21.
Therefore,
x→4limx−4x−2=x→4limx+21.
Substituting:
2+21=41.
Therefore,
x→4limx−4x−2=41
13. One-Sided Limits
We have already seen that we can approach a point from the left or from the right.
The left-hand limit is
x→a−limf(x).
The right-hand limit is
x→a+limf(x).
For the two-sided limit to exist, we need
x→a−limf(x)=x→a+limf(x)
Example
Consider a function such that
x→2−limf(x)=4
and
x→2+limf(x)=4.
Then,
x→2limf(x)=4
On the other hand, if
x→2−limf(x)=4
and
x→2+limf(x)=7,
then
x→2limf(x) does not exist
14. A Strategy for Calculating Limits
When encountering a limit, we can follow a sequence of steps.
Step 1 — Try Direct Substitution
Calculate
f(a).
If the result is a well-defined real number, the limit is generally determined.
The most common forms are
00
and
∞∞.
These expressions are not results of limits. They indicate that we need to continue working with the expression.
Step 3 — Look for a Simplification
Depending on the expression, we can use:
- factoring;
- notable products;
- rationalization;
- reducing to a common denominator;
- trigonometric identities.
Step 4 — Calculate the Limit Again
After simplifying, try direct substitution again.
15. Complete Example
Calculate
x→3limx−3x2−9.
Direct Substitution
3−332−9=00.
We have an indeterminate form.
Factoring
x2−9=(x−3)(x+3).
Therefore,
x−3x2−9=x+3,x=3.
Thus,
x→3limx−3x2−9=x→3lim(x+3).
Finally,
3+3=6.
Therefore,
x→3limx−3x2−9=6
16. Summary of the Main Properties
If
x→alimf(x)=L
and
x→alimg(x)=M,
then:
Sum
x→alim[f(x)+g(x)]=L+M
Difference
x→alim[f(x)−g(x)]=L−M
Product
x→alim[f(x)g(x)]=LM
Quotient
If M=0,
x→alimg(x)f(x)=ML
Constant
x→alimc=c
Power
x→alim[f(x)]n=Ln
Root
When defined,
x→alimnf(x)=nL
17. Main Techniques
| Situation | Strategy |
|---|
| Substitution gives a number | Direct substitution |
| 00 appears in polynomials | Factoring |
| Roots appear | Rationalization |
| Piecewise-defined function | One-sided limits |
| Trigonometric expressions | Trigonometric identities |
| Limits at infinity | Comparison of dominant terms |
18. What Comes Next?
With these properties and techniques, we can now move on to some of the most important limits in Calculus I.
One of the next fundamental results is:
x→0limxsenx=1
This limit will later be used in the derivation of trigonometric functions.
From it, we can also study limits involving
x1−cosx,xtanx,
as well as exponential and logarithmic limits.